Foreign media outlets are beginning to release reviews of the iPhone 16e, the newest budget-friendly model from Apple, which is set to go on sale tomorrow (February 28). The key question on many users’ minds is whether the features received at this price point are still worth considering. (Starting at $599 in the US, 22,900 baht in Thailand).
The highlight of the iPhone 16e is the switch from using Qualcomm’s modem chip to their own designed chip called C1. While many critics feel no significant difference compared to the iPhone 16, it is able to perform smoothly in every aspect.
Battery life and usage duration have seen improvements with the switch to the C1 chip. Apple claims that the iPhone 16e can last longer than any previous iPhone model with a 6.1-inch screen, boasting a battery size of 3,961 mAh, slightly larger than the iPhone 16’s 3,561 mAh. Usage patterns are reported to be similar, but with proper management, the device can last throughout the day.
One notable issue with the iPhone 16e is the lack of MagSafe support, which may disappoint users who were accustomed to wireless charging. However, for those currently using the iPhone SE and the single rear camera, general photography and video capture capabilities remain adequate.
Here is a summary of scores and reviews from various outlets:
Tom’s Guide: 4/5 – Good camera, sleek design, but considered pricey.
CNET: 8.5/10 – Not budget-friendly, solid battery life, and complete Apple features.
The Verge: 7/10 – Would be great if priced $3-4 thousand less.
Engadget: 77/100 – Good performance but comes with a hefty price tag.
TLDR: The iPhone 16e brings a shift in modem chip design, offering improved battery life and usage duration, although lacking MagSafe support. Reviews highlight its solid performance but acknowledge its relatively high price point.
Leave a Comment